BY: MEGAN MILSTEAD
OCT. 25, 2007
158 million pieces of paper. 2.5 million aluminum cans. 2.8 million plastic bottles. According to Miami Recycles’ Web site, Miami University students, faculty and staff have recycled enough trash to prevent more than 21 million tons of greenhouse gasses from escaping into the atmosphere since January 2003.
But despite the university’s efforts, which created a recycling program in 1990 and has steadily improved it since then, some feel more can be done.
Student group Green Oxford (GO) has a mission to increase environmental sustainability in the Miami and Oxford communities. President Cortney Schiappa said a committee is working to find ways for Miami to improve its recycling practices.
“We don’t think it’s good enough,” Schiappa said. “If you’re going through all the effort to recycle you might as well go all out.”
As part of its initiative, GO splits recycling into three categories: indoor on- campus, outdoor on-campus, and off-campus.
Kay Reichenbach is the GO member in charge of indoors, on-campus recycling. She chose this focus because she wants to see the changes she made.
“I felt like recycling on campus was where changes would actually be visible,” Reichenbach said. “I don’t want to be in a club just to go to meetings. I want to feel like I’m accomplishing something.”
Reichenbach is focusing on plastic to-go containers such as those used at Uncle Phil’s Deli and Bell Tower, and napkins use at dining halls. In the past, the plastic containers have been a No. 6 or 7 plastic, while Miami can only recycle Nos. 1 and 2. The napkins are also non-recyclable.
Jon Brubacher, manager of food purchasing at Miami’s Culinary Support Center, said that within the past year Miami has attempted to make the jump to recyclable plastics.
“We’ve switched the vast majority of our plastic containers,” Brubacher said. “We’ve used from probably well over 1,000 of those clamshells [the No. 6 plastic container] a week down to maybe 200.”
Along with napkins, other items are on the recycling radar for Brubacher.
“We are open to anything,” Brubacher said. “We’re looking at different napkins. I have a couple different types of cutlery on my desk right now.”
Unfortunately, new environmentally friendly products such as silverware are still evolving, he said.
“Six months ago quality was terrible,” Brubacher said. “The only thing going for it was that it was silverware.”
Cost is also an issue. The first round of silverware, made from corn starch, cost nearly three times the price of the plastic cutlery now in use. The price of a second round of silverware has dropped to two times the price. Competition among companies will help make recyclable silverware and other food service supplies a reality, Brubacher said.
“More and more companies are getting into environmental products and the more companies there are, the better it is for everyone,” he said.
Off-campus recycling, meanwhile, may be harder to increase. While homeowners who have trash pick up from Rumpke can request a recycling bin for free, apartment dwellers cannot.
According to Amanda Pratt, communication manager for Rumpke Recycling, the company has a contract with the city of Oxford. Landlords must go through the city to obtain a recycling container. Schiappa hopes to hold an informative landlord luncheon at the beginning of the spring semester with a representative from Rumpke to better inform landlords about recycling.
Contamination of recycling bins is another challenge to increasing city-wide waste reduction.
“It’s a universal issue,” Pratt said. “Any time there’s a recycling drop box people see it and think they can put anything in it.”
While such containers can still be sorted, they require more time and manpower—which could end up costing more money and energy to complete the recycling of a contaminated bin.
Because of setbacks like that, educating students and Oxford residents is the key to successful recycling, Pratt said.
“It’s building awareness about recycling,” Pratt said. “It’s getting landlords to buy into having a container somewhere on their property.”
Brubacher agreed participation is crucial.
“We have a pretty good recycling program but it’s like any program—for it to actually work people have to participate in it,” he said.
Schiappa said students especially need to understand how recycling works.
“We need to make sure we inform them to use [recycling] correctly,” Schiappa said. “Even in the dorms when it’s provided, people don’t use it.”
As part of their own education, members of GO recently toured Rumpke Recycling facilities in Cincinnati.
“We wanted to educate ourselves so we could educate other people,” Schiappa said.
Despite its critics, Miami’s recycling center has attracted significant attention. It began a program called Recycle Mania in 2001 with Ohio University. The event tracks the amount of recycling at each participating school over the course of 10 weeks. From its humble beginnings, Recycle Mania has exploded into a competition among 201 schools this year. According to Recycle Mania’s Web site, the schools recycled 41.3 million pounds of waste in 2007. Miami’s contribution to that was an average of 66.2 pounds of garbage recycled per student.
Pratt agrees Miami’s recycling is on the right track.
“You guys have a great program at Miami,” Pratt said. “It’s one of the best in the area.”

